Author: Calleen Hough

God in Human Form

Genesis 1:26 tells us that the human race came into existence through the creation of a single man who was called Adam. It states, “Then God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.’” The Hebrew word that is translated image, tselem (tsehˊ-lem) “means image in the sense of essential nature: human nature in its internal and external characteristics rather than an exact duplicate…God made man in his own image, reflecting some of His own perfections: perfect in knowledge, righteousness, and holiness, and with dominion over the creatures (Genesis 1:26). Being created in God’s image meant being created male and female, in a loving unity of more than one person (Genesis 1:27). It also says in Genesis 1:26 that we were created after God’s likeness. The Hebrew word dᵉmuwth (dem-oothˊ) means “resemblance” and more concretely, “model, shape.” When we see family members, we sometimes notice a family resemblance. Family members look like each other because of the genetic code they share; so you might say that God’s creation of human beings was the result him replicating his own DNA, similar to a man and woman conceiving a child.

The conception of Jesus was possible because God and humans have similar natures and a genetic makeup that enables them to be joined together into a single entity. It says in Luke 1:30-35:

And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.”

And Mary said to the angel, “How will this be, since I am a virgin?”

And the angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy—the Son of God.

It says in Hebrews 1:3 that the Son of God is “the exact imprint of his nature.” Jesus is the essence (G5287) of God, an exact copy of his character (G5481), represented in the form of a human being. Jesus told his disciple Philip, “Whoever has seen me has seen the Father” (John 14:9).

The announcement of Jesus’ birth indicates that he was not just the Son of God, but also the anticipated Messiah that would save God’s people from the guilt and power of sin and from eternal death (G4990). Luke 2:11 states, “For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.” When he was presented at the temple, shortly after his birth, a man named Simeon spoke about Jesus’ role through the Holy Spirit. Luke says about Simeon, “And it had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he would not see death before he had seen the Lord’s Christ. And he came in the Spirit into the temple, and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him according to the custom of the Law, he took him up in his arms and blessed God and said, “Lord, now you are letting your servant depart in peace according to your word; for my eyes have seen your salvation that you have prepared in the presence of all peoples, a light for revelation to the Gentiles, and for glory to your people Israel’” (Luke 2:26-32). Simeon said that he had seen God’s salvation (Luke 2:30). The Greek word that is translated salvation, soterion (so-tayˊ-ree-on) means “a savior, deliverer. Delivering, saving, bringing salvation” (G4992).

The idea that Jesus’ birth brought salvation into the world is expanded on in Titus 2:11-14. Paul wrote to Titus, “For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people, training us to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age, waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, who gave himself for us to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people for his own possession who are zealous for good works.” The training that Paul was referring to was the training of a child, “i.e. educate, or (by implication) discipline” (G3811). According to Paul, salvation is a training process that humans go through in order to become more like God. It involves discipline that causes us to “renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives” (Titus 2:13).

The way that Jesus educated or you might say disciplined his disciples was by demonstrating for them appropriate behavior. The night before he was crucified, Jesus washed his disciples’ feet in order to teach them how sanctification works. John tells us:

Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he had come from God and was going back to God, rose from supper. He laid aside his outer garments, and taking a towel, tied it around his waist. Then he poured water into a basin and began to wash the disciples’ feet and to wipe them with the towel that was wrapped around him. He came to Simon Peter, who said to him, “Lord, do you wash my feet?” Jesus answered him, “What I am doing you do not understand now, but afterward you will understand.” Peter said to him, “You shall never wash my feet.” Jesus answered him, “If I do not wash you, you have no share with me.” Simon Peter said to him, “Lord, not my feet only but also my hands and my head!” Jesus said to him, “The one who has bathed does not need to wash, except for his feet, but is completely clean. And you are clean, but not every one of you.” For he knew who was to betray him; that was why he said, “Not all of you are clean.” (John 13:3-11)

“By his statement, ‘If I do not wash you, you have no share with me,’ it seems that the Lord was referring to the necessity of regular spiritual cleansing to remain in fellowship with him. Jesus did not say, ‘you have no share in me (en [1722] emoi), which would indicate Peter lacked salvation, but ‘you have no share with me (met’ [3326] emou), meaning Peter would have no communion and fellowship with him. Christians need constant cleansing and renewal if they are to remain in fellowship with God” (note on John 13:8).

Jesus went on to explain to his disciples the reason why he, the Creator of the human race, became a human being. John said:

When he had washed their feet and put on his outer garments and resumed his place, he said to them, “Do you understand what I have done to you? You call me Teacher and Lord, and you are right, for so I am. If I then, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s feet. For I have given you an example, that you also should do just as I have done to you. Truly, truly, I say to you, a servant is not greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him. If you know these things, blessed are you if you do them. (John 13:12-17)

Jesus wanted his disciples to understand that sanctification was not something that they could achieve independent of God. Sanctification is a process that involves service. Jesus demonstrated how to do it so that his disciples would have an example to follow. God was no longer just telling the people of Israel what they needed to do. Jesus showed the people how to do it by doing it himself.

Paul told the Philippian believers, “Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others. Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross” (Philippians 2:4-8). Paul said that Jesus found himself in human form, making it sound as if Jesus woke up one day and discovered that he had been changed into a human being. The Greek word that is translated found, heurisko (hyoo-risˊ-ko) is “spoken of computation, measurement, to find, figure out a value, a distance, etc. (Acts 19:19; 27:28). To find out mentally, i.e. to invent, contrive, to find a way to do something” (G2147). When God formulated his plan of salvation, it seems likely that it was based on him finding a way to manifest himself in human form. The good news for us is that we don’t have to find a way to do the reciprocal. We were created in the likeness of God, all we have to do is believe that Jesus’ death on the cross is able to restore the divine image within us.

God’s messenger

The link between the Old and New Testaments of the Bible is sometimes difficult to grasp because of the differences between the Old and New Covenants that govern their content. The Old Covenant was “made with Israel as the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and as the people the Lord has redeemed from bondage to an earthly power.” It was “a conditional divine pledge to be Israel’s God (as her Protector and the Guarantor of her blessed destiny); the condition: Israel’s total consecration to the Lord as his people (His kingdom) who live by his rule and serve his purposes in history” (Major Covenants in the Old Testament, p. 16, KJSB). The Mosaic Law was given to the Israelites so that they would be aware of and follow the standard by which God would measure their devotion and obedience to him. At the end of his life, Moses told the people of Israel, “For the commandment that I command you today is not too hard for you, neither is it far off. It is not in heaven, that you should say, ‘Who will ascend to heaven for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it? Neither is it beyond the seas that you should say, ‘Who will go over the sea for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it? But the word is very near you. It is in your mouth and in your heart so that you can do it” (Deuteronomy 30:11-14). The Old Testament ends with God rebuking Israel’s priests for turning aside from the way that he had established for them to worship him (Malachi 2:8), and a declaration that Judah had profaned God’s covenant by marrying the daughter of a foreign god (Malachi 2:11). God announced his intention of establishing a new covenant through the prophet Malachi. God said, “Behold, I send my messenger, and he will prepare the way before me. And the Lord whom you seek will suddenly come to his temple; and the messenger of the covenant in whom you delight, behold he is coming says the LORD of hosts” (Malachi 3:1)

The New Covenant was “an unconditional divine promise to unfaithful Israel to forgive her sins and establish a relationship with her on a new basis by writing His law ‘in their hearts’—a covenant of pure grace” (Major Covenants in the Old Testament, p. 16, KJSB). Grace was not a new concept to the people of Israel, but they didn’t seem to understand how it worked. Jesus talked about grace in terms of a “benefit” or “credit” that one might receive for doing a good deed (Luke 6:32-34), and then said, “But love your enemies, and do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return, and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, for he is kind to the ungrateful and the evil. Be merciful, even as your Father is merciful” (Luke 6:35-36). The Apostle Paul told the believers in Ephesus that it is “by grace that you have been saved…For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast” (Ephesians 2:5, 8-9). The Greek word that is translated works in Ephesians 2:9, er-gon (erˊ-gon) is speaking “of works of the law, meaning works required or conformable to the Mosaic moral law and required by the law” (G2041). Paul indicated that a person might be inclined to boast if he was able to live according to the Mosaic Law. Therefore, God chose to give salvation to us based on our faith in Jesus Christ.

God said of his messenger in Malachi 3:1, “he will prepare the way before me.” The Hebrew word derek (dehˊ-rek) is used figuratively to refer to “a course of life or mode of (action)” (H1870). When God said that his messenger would prepare the way, he meant that his messenger would focus people’s attention on the way they were living. Zechariah’s prophecy about his son John touched on this very point (Luke 1:76), and indicated that John would, “give knowledge of salvation to his people in the forgiveness of sins because of the tender mercy of our God, whereby the sunrise shall visit us from on high to give light to those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace” (Luke 1:77-79). The idea that God’s grace can guide our feet into the way of peace is based on the fact that the Holy Spirit is able to convict us of our sin and cause us to repent (John 16:8). It says in Matthew 3:1-3:

In those days John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of Judea, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” For this is he who was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah when he said,

“The voice of one crying in the wilderness:
‘Prepare the way of the Lord;
    make his paths straight.’”

The Greek word that is translated repent in Matthew 3:1, metanoeo (met-an-o-ehˊ-o) means “to think differently or afterwards, i.e. reconsider” (G3340) and has to do with changing your mind. Paul describes repentance as a time-limited, opportunity in Hebrews 12:17 where he says of Jacob’s brother Esau, “For you know that afterward, when he desired to inherit the blessing, he was rejected, for he found no chance to repent, though he sought it with tears.” John the Baptist’s preparation of the way for those who wanted to receive Christ as their Savior was also a time-limited opportunity. Not long after Jesus launched his ministry, John was arrested (Matthew 4:12), and a short while later, he was beheaded by Herod the tetrarch (Matthew 14:10). Jesus said of John, “Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has arisen no one greater than John the Baptist. Yet the one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he” (Matthew 11:11).

Jesus’ declaration that the one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than John the Baptist (Matthew 11:11) was based on the fact that John was not a born again believer. Jesus prefaced his statement about John with the stipulation “among those born of women.” Jesus explained to a man named Nicodemus that “unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. That which is born of flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit” (John 3:5-6). Jesus distinguished between the two types of birth that a person could experience and stated that a spiritual birth was required for entrance into God’s kingdom. Throughout the New Testament, the Greek word that was used to refer to John as God’s messenger, aggelos (angˊ-el-os) is translated as angel or angels. Aggelos is derived from the word ago (agˊ-o), which is used metaphorically in Romans 2:4 to refer to leading (ago) someone to repentance. Paul asked, “Or do you presume on the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience, not knowing that God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance?” It seems likely that God’s messenger, John the Baptist was perceived by most people to be an angel of kindness. John brought hope to those who were sitting in darkness and in the shadow of death through his message about God’s forgiveness of sins. It was the religious hypocrites who hated John and wanted to stop him from leading people to the light of Jesus Christ.

Jesus’ parable about tenants who killed their master’s son so that they could have his inheritance explains the reason why God replaced the Old Covenant that he made with Abraham’s descendants with a new one. Jesus stated:

“Hear another parable. There was a master of a house who planted a vineyard and put a fence around it and dug a winepress in it and built a tower and leased it to tenants, and went into another country. When the season for fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the tenants to get his fruit. And the tenants took his servants and beat one, killed another, and stoned another. Again he sent other servants, more than the first. And they did the same to them. Finally he sent his son to them, saying, ‘They will respect my son.’ But when the tenants saw the son, they said to themselves, ‘This is the heir. Come, let us kill him and have his inheritance.’ And they took him and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him. When therefore the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those tenants?” They said to him, “He will put those wretches to a miserable death and let out the vineyard to other tenants who will give him the fruits in their seasons.”

Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures:

“‘The stone that the builders rejected
    has become the cornerstone;
this was the Lord’s doing,
    and it is marvelous in our eyes’?

Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits. And the one who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; and when it falls on anyone, it will crush him.” (Matthew 21:33-44)

The issue that caused a conflict between the master of the house and his tenants was possession of the fruit from his vineyard. When the master’s servants came to get his fruit, the tenants “beat one, killed another, and stoned another” (Matthew 21:35). What we’re not told is whether or not there was any fruit, and if there was, what the tenants did with it. Jesus’ solution seems to indicate that the tenants hadn’t produced any fruit. Jesus said the kingdom of God would be taken away and given to a people producing or bringing forth its fruits (Matthew 21:43).

Jesus talked about bringing forth fruit in many of his lessons and parables and explained in his parable of the sower that it’s not just hearing the word of God, but understanding it that causes fruit to be produced in the heart of a believer (Matthew 13:23). Jesus said understanding with the heart causes a person to be converted (Matthew 13:15). To be converted means that you reverse your direction in life and “become another kind of person e.g., to become like children” (G4762). Jesus told his disciples, “Unless you turn (strepho, G4762) and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 18:3). The first step in the process of being converted is to repent. John the Baptist told the people who came to him when he was preaching in the wilderness of Judea, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” (Matthew 3:1-2) and later, Jesus told the religious hypocrites who wanted to see a sign from him, “The men of Ninevah will rise up at the judgment with this generation and condemn it, for they repented at the preaching of Jonah, and behold something greater than Jonah is here” (Matthew 12:41).

Turning aside from the way

Shortly before Jesus’ crucifixion, he encouraged his disciples by giving them a glimpse into their future with him in heaven. Jesus told them:

“Don’t let your hearts be troubled. Trust in God, and trust also in me. There is more than enough room in my Father’s home. If this were not so, would I have told you that I am going to prepare a place for you? When everything is ready, I will come and get you, so that you will always be with me where I am. And you know the way to where I am going.”

“No, we don’t know, Lord,” Thomas said. “We have no idea where you are going, so how can we know the way?”

Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me.” (John 14:1-6, NLT)

When Jesus referred to himself as the way, he was talking about himself as “the author and medium of access to God and eternal life (John 14:6).” The Greek word that is translated way, hodos (hod-osˊ) refers to “the route” or “a traveler’s way,” a means of getting somewhere. Metaphorically, hodos speaks “of ‘a course of conduct,’ or ‘way of thinking’” (G3598). In the Old Testament, the Hebrew word derek (dehˊ-rek), which is also translated way, is associated with one’s “destiny,” “the overall course and fixed path of one’s life” (H1870).

The Israelites journey out of Egypt, through the wilderness, and into the Promised Land was directed by God. It says in Exodus 13:17-18, “When Pharaoh let the people go, God did not lead them by way (derek) of the land of the Philistines, although that was near. For God said, ‘Lest the people change their minds when they see war and return to Egypt.’ But God led the people around by the way (derek) of the wilderness toward the Red Sea.” It also says in Exodus 13:21-22, “And the LORD went before them by day in a pillar of cloud to lead them along the way (derek), and by night in a pillar of fire to give them light, that they might travel by day and by night. The pillar of cloud by day and the pillar of fire by night did not depart from before the people.” God not only charted the Israelites’ course, but went along with them to make sure they reached their destination or you might say, their destiny.

Late in Israel’s Old Testament history, a prophet by the name of Malachi reminded God’s chosen people of his love for them (Malachi 1:2-5) and warned the priests about turning aside from the way. Malachi said:

For the lips of a priest should guard knowledge, and people should seek instruction from his mouth, for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts. But you have turned aside from the way. You have caused many to stumble by your instruction. You have corrupted the covenant of Levi, says the LORD of hosts, and so I make you despised and abased before all the people, inasmuch as you do not keep my ways but show partiality in your instruction. (Malachi 2:7-9)

The Hebrew word that is translated turned aside, suwr (soor) “is used metaphorically to describe turning away from the Lord because of a rebellious heart (Jeremiah 5:23)…Its meaning extends further to indicate falling away, as when one is enticed to fall away from following the Lord to pursue other gods (Deuteronomy 11:16; 1 Samuel 12:20; Psalm 14:3). We are told in the book of Acts that Judas, the disciple that betrayed Jesus, “turned aside to go to his own place” (Acts 1:25). Jesus’ explanation of the purpose of his parables gives us some insight into what it means to turn aside and go to your own place. Jesus said, “Now the parable is this: The seed is the word of God. The ones along the path are those who have heard; then the devil comes and takes away the word from their hearts, so that they may not believe and be saved” (Luke 8:11-12). Judas knew the word of God, but it had no effect on him.

The book of Ecclesiastes was written at a time in Solomon’s life when he had the ability to look back over the course of his life and could see the end result. Solomon concluded his message with some advice for young people who still had their lives ahead of them. “Solomon had failed miserably in restraining his fleshly desires. His many pagan wives had turned his heart away from serving God (1 Kings 11:1-8). He therefore encouraged young people to follow the Lord while they were still in their youth. The temporary pleasures of this life cannot compare to the joy that comes from living for God” (note on Ecclesiastes 12:1). Solomon exclaimed, “Rejoice, O young man, in your youth, and let your heart cheer you in the days of your youth. Walk in the ways of your heart and the sight of your eyes. But know that for all these things God will bring you into judgment” (Ecclesiastes 11:9).

Solomon’s recommendation to follow your heart and do what appears to be right according to your own viewpoint was followed by a reality check on what he expected to happen afterward. Solomon understood that in the end, God decides whether or not we have done the right thing, if we have fulfilled our destiny. Solomon went on to say, “Remember also your Creator in the days of your youth, before the evil days come and the years draw near of which you will say, ‘I have no pleasure in them’” (Ecclesiastes 12:1). Solomon had experienced first-hand the result of turning aside from the way and wanted others to know that it wasn’t a good idea for them to do what he had done. Solomon concluded his message by stating, “The end of the matter: all has been heard. Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgment, with every secret thing, whether good or evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14).

Life is unpredictable

One of the underlying themes of Solomon’s gospel was that life is unpredictable. As a result of his pursuit of all that life had to offer him, Solomon concluded, “See, this alone I found, that God made man upright, but they have sought out many schemes” (Ecclesiastes 7:29). What Solomon meant by this statement was that God created humans with a specific purpose in mind, a course that they are intended to follow, but we would rather chart our own course and do as we please. It says in Isaiah 53:6, “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned—everyone—to his own way.” The Hebrew word that is translated turned, panah (paw-nawˊ) “is a verb of either physical or mental motion…Used in intellectual and spiritual turning, this verb signifies attaching oneself to something…In an even stronger use this verb represents dependence on someone” (H6437). Therefore, when we turn to our own may, we are depending on ourselves to work out a situation as we would like it to be. There is a lack of dependence on God.

Solomon said of humans, “They have sought out many schemes” (Ecclesiastes 7:29). A scheme is something that requires mental calculation. The Hebrew word that is translated scheme, chishshabown (khish-shaw-boneˊ) is derived from the word châshab (khaw-shabˊ). “Generally, this root signifies a mental process whereby some course is planned or conceived. It means ‘to think, account, reckon, devise, plan’” (H2803). Chashab is used in Genesis 15:6 where it says the LORD counted Abraham’s belief in him as righteousness. In other words, Abraham’s belief in God, his reliance upon God’s promise of redemption, caused God to devise a plan of salvation that would result in Abraham being saved or being made right with God. The problem with us seeking out schemes to save ourselves is that it’s impossible for us to meet God’s standard of righteousness. Isaiah said, “We are all infected and impure with sin. When we display our righteous deeds, they are nothing but filthy rags” (Isaiah 64:6, NLT).

Solomon came to the conclusion that behavior does not determine the outcome of one’s life. Solomon said, “In my vain life I have seen everything. There is a righteous man who perishes in his righteousness, and there is a wicked man who prolongs his life in his evildoing. Be not overly righteous, and do not make yourself too wise. Why should you destroy yourself?” (Ecclesiastes 7:15-16). The Hebrew word that Solomon used that is translated destroy, shamem (shaw-mameˊ) means “to stun (or intransitive grow numb), i.e. devastate or (figurative) stupefy (both usually in a passive sense)…What one sees sometimes is so horrible that it ‘horrifies’ or ‘appalls’” (H8074). The point that I believe Solomon was trying to make was that someone who is overly righteous, someone who has done everything right, or at least thinks that he has done everything right, will be shocked or perhaps even horrified if/when a tragedy occurs in his life. His response might likely be outrage, “How could this happen to me!!!? I’ve done everything that God expects of me!!! How could God let this happen!!!?” When Job realized that he had lost everything, it says in Job 1:20-22:

Then Job arose and tore his robe and shaved his head and fell on the ground and worshiped. And he said, “Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return. The Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.”

In all this Job did not sin or charge God with wrong.

“Job’s expression was not a fatalistic submission to the inevitability of events; it was an acknowledgement of God’s sovereignty. Solomon advised his readers, “In the day of prosperity be joyful, and in the day of adversity consider: God has made the one as well as the other, so that man may not find out anything that will be after him” (Ecclesiastes 7:14). According to Solomon, prosperity and adversity are both a part of the course that God has planned out for each of us to follow so that we can’t figure out what’s going to happen next, life is unpredictable.

Solomon warned his readers against the vanity of wealth and honor (Ecclesiastes 5:8-17) and advised them to find enjoyment in what God had allotted to each individual. Solomon said, “Even so, I have noticed one thing, at least, that is good. It is good for people to eat, drink, and enjoy their work under the sun during the short life God has given them, and to accept their lot in life. And it is a good thing to receive wealth from God and the good health to enjoy it. To enjoy your work and accept your lot in life—this is indeed a gift from God. God keeps such people so busy enjoying life that they take no time to brood over the past.” (Ecclesiastes 5:18-20, NLT). Solomon went on to explain that the future had already been determined, and it would continue to be unknown to each person, what would happen after he died. Solomon said:

Everything has already been decided. It was known long ago what each person would be. So there’s no use arguing with God about your destiny.

The more words you speak, the less they mean. So what good are they?

In the few days of our meaningless lives, who knows how our days can best be spent? Our lives are like a shadow. Who can tell what will happen on this earth after we are gone? (Ecclesiastes 6:10-12, NLT)

Solomon’s conclusion that everything had already been decided was echoed by Paul in his letter to the Ephesians. Paul indicated that God had already decided who would receive his gift of salvation “before the foundation of the world” (Ephesians 1:4), and when he raised Christ from the dead, God “seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places far above all rule and authority and power and dominion and above every name that is named, not only in this age, but also in the one to come” (Ephesians 1:20-21).

Solomon’s solution to the unpredictability of life was to recognize the power and position of God and to render him proper respect. Solomon said, “Though a sinner does evil a hundred times and prolongs his life, yet I know that it will be well with those who fear God, because they fear before him” (Ecclesiastes 8:12). Fearing God has to do with our attitude toward him and our willingness to do what he wants us to. “The people who were delivered from Egypt saw God’s great power, ‘feared the Lord, and believed the Lord, and his servant Moses’ (Exodus 14:31). There is more involved here than mere psychological fear. The people also showed proper ‘honor’ (‘reverence’) for God and ‘stood in awe of’ Him and his servant, as their song demonstrates (Exodus 15). After experiencing the thunder, lightning flashes, sound of the trumpet, and smoking mountain, they were ‘afraid’ and drew back; but Moses told them not to be afraid, ‘for God is come to prove you, and that his fear may be before your faces, that ye sin not” (Exodus 20:20)” (H3372).

Mary’s Song of Praise: The Magnificat begins with the statement, “My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior, for he has looked on the humble estate of his servant” (Luke 1:46-48). Mary went on to say, “For behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed; for he who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is his name. And his mercy is for those who fear him from generation to generation” (Luke 1:48-50). Mary connected the fear of God to obtaining his mercy. The Greek word that Mary used, eleos (elˊ-eh-os) is “spoken of the mercy of God through Christ, i.e. salvation in the Christian sense from sin and misery (Jude 21, ‘the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ’ means salvation through Christ; see Romans 11:31)” (G1656). In his letter to the Romans, Paul talked about the mystery of Israel’s salvation. Paul said, “For just as you were at one time disobedient to God but now have received mercy because of their disobedience, so they too have now been disobedient in order that by the mercy shown to you they also may now receive mercy. For God has consigned all to disobedience, that he may have mercy on all” (Romans 11:30-32).

Paul’s explanation of how God’s mercy works was likely a startling revelation to those who were hoping to outwit God. The Pharisees in particular thought that they had mastered the art of bending God’s rules to suit their own objectives. Jesus said to the scribes and Pharisees, “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead people’s bones and all uncleanness. So you also outwardly appear righteous to others, but within you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness” (Matthew 23:27-28). Solomon echoed Jesus’ sentiment when he said, “that there are righteous people to whom it happens according to the deeds of the wicked, and there are wicked people to whom it happens according to the deeds of the righteous” (Ecclesiastes 8:14). Solomon’s conclusion that your behavior does not determine the outcome of your life because God’s sovereignty causes life to be unpredictable is based on the fact that God is able to discriminate between good and evil and can choose out the good. Paul declared in his letter to the Romans, “Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!” (Romans 11:33).

The preacher

The book of Ecclesiastes is the Old Testament’s version of a gospel message. It could be referred to as “The Gospel According to Solomon.” Solomon opened his message with the declaration, “The words of the Preacher, the son of David, king in Jerusalem” (Ecclesiastes 1:1). The term preacher is used by the Apostle Paul in Romans 10:14 where he asks, “How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?” (KJV). The Greek word that is translated preacher, euaggelizo (yoo-ang-ghel-idˊ-zo) means “to announce good news (‘evangelize’) especially the gospel” (G2097). One of the differences between the Old Testament’s version of the gospel and the New Testament gospel that was preached by Jesus and his disciples was that Solomon’s message didn’t appear to be good news. On the contrary, Solomon began his message with the statement, “Vanity of vanities, says the Preacher, vanity of vanities! All is vanity” (Ecclesiastes 1:2). “The theme of the book of Ecclesiastes is that ‘under the sun’ (i.e., apart from God), everything is ‘vanity,’ a key word that occurs thirty-five times in the book. The term is used to describe outward and tangible things (Ecclesisastes 1:14; 2:11, 17) as well as inward thoughts (Ecclesiastes 2:15, 19). ‘Vanity’ is a translation of the Hebrew hebel (H1892), which emphasizes that which is empty and passing. The phrase ‘vanity of vanities’ denotes the Hebrew way of expressing a superlative and could be translated ‘most futile’” (note on Ecclesiastes 1:2, 3).

“The Hebrew term hebel, translated vanity or vain, refers concretely to a ‘mist,’ ‘vapor,’ or ‘mere breath,’ and metaphorically to something that is fleeting or elusive (with different nuances depending on the context)” (Ecclesiastes 1:2 footnote). The reason why Solomon began by emphasizing the elusiveness or most futile nature of life on earth may have been because he wanted his audience to know that there was something missing, that there had to be more to life than what we typically experience on a day to day basis. Jesus told his disciples, “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly” (John 10:10). The Greek term perissos (per-is-sosˊ), translated abundantly, is derived from the word peri (per-eeˊ), which is properly translated as “through (all over), i.e. around” (G4012), “(in the sense of beyond); superabundant (in quantity) or superior (in quality); (by implication) excessive” (G4053). The difference between the abundant (perissos) life that Jesus promised and Solomon’s experience was that Solomon pursued an excessive kind of lifestyle that he thought would bring him satisfaction, whereas Jesus indicated that the way to experience abundant life was by forsaking everything and following him (Matthew 19:21, 29).

Solomon’s conclusion that all is vanity isn’t surprising given that he pursued everything under the sun; that is apart from God, but some of his discoveries pointed to the underlying logic behind God’s plan of salvation. Solomon said, “To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven” (Ecclesiastes 3:1, KJV). “God causes all things to happen in their ‘seasons,’ according to his purpose and his timetable. God delivered the Israelites from bondage in Egypt on the ‘very day’ (Exodus 12:41) he had in mind when he promised deliverance to Abraham 430 years earlier (see note on Genesis 15:12-16). Christ was born ‘when the fullness of time had come’ (Galatians 4:4), accomplishing the Father’s will…God knows all the events that have transpired in the past as well as all things that will occur in the future. Man is incapable of finding out ‘what God has done from the beginning to the end,’ but God has established the outcome of history and determined how each piece fits into his plan. It is therefore wise for man to trust completely in God” (notes on Ecclesiastes 3:1and 3:11).

Solomon’s insight into how to deal with the evil that is under the sun is consistent with Paul’s approach to successfully preaching the gospel. Solomon said:

Two are better than one, because they have a good reward for their toil. For if they fall, one will lift up his fellow. But woe to him who is alone when he falls and has not another to lift him up! Again, if two lie together, they keep warm, but how can one keep warm alone? And though a man might prevail against one who is alone, two will withstand him—a threefold cord is not quickly broken. (Ecclesiastes 4:9-12)

Throughout Paul’s ministry, he always had a companion to encourage and support him. By contrast, Solomon, unlike his father David who spoke of his deep affection for his friend Jonathan, never mentions being close to anyone in any of his writings in the Bible. This seems to be a differentiating characteristic between the two preachers and may be an indicator of whether or not someone has received the abundant life that Jesus promised. Do you have someone by your side that lifts you up when you fall down or does it seem like getting up again is a most futile effort?

A love song

God’s relationship with the nation of Israel was intended to be based on a mutual love that was reflected in the interaction between the two parties. Not long after they had been delivered from slavery in Egypt, Moses reminded the people of Israel:

“For you are a people holy to the Lord your God. The Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for his treasured possession, out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth. It was not because you were more in number than any other people that the Lord set his love on you and chose you, for you were the fewest of all peoples, but it is because the Lord loves you and is keeping the oath that he swore to your fathers, that the Lord has brought you out with a mighty hand and redeemed you from the house of slavery, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.”

Moses said that God had chosen the people of Israel because he loved them. The Hebrew word that is translated chosen, bachar (baw-kharˊ) “is used 30 times in Deuteronomy, all but twice referring to God’s ‘choice’ of Israel or something in Israel’s life.” Bachar is “a verb whose meaning is to take a keen look at, to prove, to choose. It denotes a choice, which is based on a thorough examination of the situation and not an arbitrary whim. Although the word rarely means to prove, it does communicate that sense in Isaiah 48:10, where it describes the way God tested Israel in order to make a careful choice: ‘I have tested you in the furnace of affliction’” (H977).

“God’s binding love for Israel is described as unmerited love (Deuteronomy 7:7)” (H2836). The Hebrew word that Moses used in Deuteronomy 7:8, ʾahabah (a-hab-awˊ) “signifies a powerful, intimate love between a man and a woman (Genesis 29:20; Song of Solomon 2:4, 5, 7); love between friends (2 Samuel 1:26); God’s love for His people (Isaiah 63:9; Hosea 3:1). Frequently, it is associated with forming a covenant, which enjoins loyalty (Deuteronomy 7:8)” (H160). David described his love for his friend Jonathan as extraordinary. David said in his lament after Jonathan’s death, “I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan; very pleasant have you been to me, your love to me was extraordinary, surpassing the love of women” (2 Samuel 1:26). The Hebrew word that is translated extraordinary, pala’ (paw-lawˊ) means “to do something wonderful, to do something extraordinary, or difficult. It frequently signifies the wondrous works of God, especially his deliverance and judgments (Exodus 3:20; Psalm 106:22; 136:4; Micah 7:15). The book of Hosea reveals that God’s extraordinary love for his chosen people wasn’t mutual. It says in Hosea 3:1, “And the LORD said to me, ‘Go again, love a woman who is loved by another man and is an adulteress, even as the LORD loves the children of Israel, though they turn to other gods and love cakes of raisins.”

The Song of Solomon depicts an extraordinary, mutual love between a man and woman in the context of human circumstances that interfere with them consummating their relationship. In the midst of their struggle to be together, the woman says to her companions, “I adjure you, O daughters of Jerusalem, by the gazelles or the does of the field, that you not stir up or awaken love until it pleases” (Song of Solomon 2:7). The Hebrew word that is translated stir up and awaken in this verse, ‘uwr (oor) has to do with seeing the naked truth or seeing things exactly as they are “through the idea of opening the eyes” (H5782). The connotation of the word ‘uwr suggests that love can be a harsh experience if the one who loves another is not prepared to see the person as he or she truly is. This sentiment is expressed by Hosea as he describes the LORD’s love for Israel in Hosea 11:1-11. In his conclusion of this section, Hosea indicated that the relationship between God and Israel would ultimately be restored, but the dynamic between these two parties was permanently altered because of Israel’s unfaithfulness (Hosea 11:10-11).

Part of the mystery and perhaps misunderstanding of the Song of Solomon is due to its context being human love. “The typical interpretation acknowledges the historical setting but believes that the characters and relationships are typical of Christ and the church” (Introduction to the Song of Solomon). This makes sense from the standpoint that Christ’s relationship with the church is referred to as a marriage (Revelation 19:7-8) and Paul compares Christ’s role to that of a husband and the church to a wife (Ephesians 5:23-27). The problem lies in trying to understand Christ’s relationship with the church from a human perspective with sexual intercourse being a primary objective. The thing that may be missed in this interpretation of the Song of Solomon is that the physical and emotional intimacy between the man and woman in Solomon’s song does not actually result in sexual intercourse.

The final chapters of the Song of Solomon focus on the union of the man and woman as husband and wife. The two are depicted as being together in the garden of love, but it is unclear what the husband and his bride are doing there. The woman says, “Let my beloved come to his garden, and eat its choicest fruits” (Song of Solomon 4:16) and then, “My beloved has gone down to his garden to the beds of spices, to graze in the gardens and to gather lilies. I am my beloved’s and my beloved is mine; he grazes among the lilies” (Song of Solomon 6:2-3). The Hebrew word that is translated grazes, raʿah (raw-awˊ) means “to tend a flock, i.e. pasture it…generally to rule.” The husband is in the role of a shepherd and is taking care of his flock in the garden of love when he and his bride are united. This seems to suggest that the church will be, is in the process of, or has already been united with Christ through the teaching of God’s word. When Paul talked about the roles of the husband and wife in his letter to the Ephesians and compared them to Christ and the church, it was in the context of purification through God’s word. Paul said:

Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church, because we are members of his body. (Ephesians 5:25-30)

Paul went on to talk about the mystery of two becoming one. Paul said, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh. This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church. However, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband” (Ephesians 5:31-33). The mystery of two becoming one seems to revolve around the concept of sanctification and how God’s word cleanses us from our sins. If sin separates us from God, then being cleansed from our sin, or what is referred to in the Bible as sanctification, can be thought of as a process that brings us closer and closer to God until eventually there is nothing between us, believers are viewed by God and treated as a single entity with Christ.

Like the husband and wife who are physically joined together through sexual intercourse, the joining together of Christ and his church will result in spiritual ecstasy. The marriage supper of the Lamb, which is recorded in Revelation 19, includes a brief love song of praise that encapsulates this moment of ecstasy. Revelation 19:6-8 states:

Then I heard what seemed to be the voice of a great multitude, like the roar of many waters and like the sound of mighty peals of thunder, crying out,

“Hallelujah!
For the Lord our God
    the Almighty reigns.
Let us rejoice and exult
    and give him the glory,
for the marriage of the Lamb has come,
    and his Bride has made herself ready;
it was granted her to clothe herself
    with fine linen, bright and pure”—

for the fine linen is the righteous deeds of the saints.

The Greek word basileuo (bas-il-yooˊ-o), which is translated reigns in Revelation 19:6, refers to the co-reign of Christ and the church, the outcome of marriage supper of the Lamb. Basileuo is spoken of Christians multiple times in Revelation “who are to reign with Christ, i.e. enjoy the high privileges, honors, and felicity of the Messiah’s kingdom (Romans 5:17; Revelation 5:10; 20:4, 6; 22:5). Similar to the Song of Solomon, which concludes with the bride longing for her beloved, the final chapter of Revelation looks forward to Christ’s return. Jesus promises, “Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense with me, to repay each one for what he has done” (Revelation 22:12) and in Revelation 22:17, it states, “The Spirit and the Bride say, ‘Come.’ And let the one who hears say, ‘Come.’ And let the one who is thirsty come; let the one who desires take from the water of life without price.”

A Revival

The spiritual decline of Israel reached its climax during the reign of Manasseh, the king of Judah who “did what was evil in the sight of the LORD, according to the despicable practices of the nations whom the LORD drove out before the people of Israel” (2 Kings 21:2). Manasseh’s idolatry was denounced by God (2 Kings 21:10-15) and he was brought to Babylon with hooks and bound with chains until he “humbled himself greatly before the God of his fathers” (2 Chronicles 33:11-12). Manasseh’s repentance sparked a revival in Judah that was instigated by Josiah, who was only eight years old when he began to reign in Jerusalem (2 Kings 22:1). As a result of repairs that were being made to the house of the LORD (2 Kings 22:3-7), it says in 2 Kings 22:8, “And Hilkiah the high priest said to Shaphan the secretary, ‘I have found the Book of the Law in the house of the LORD.’ And Hilkiah gave the book to Shaphan, and he read it.” “The book given to Josiah may have included the whole Pentateuch (the first five books of the Old Testament). The blessings and curses detailed in Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28 as well as the promises in Deuteronomy 29 and 30 were instrumental in beginning Josiah’s revival” (note on 2 Chronicles 34:14-19).

The reading of the Book of the Law to the people of Israel was supposed to occur every seven years (Deuteronomy 31:10-11), but it is likely that no one had read the book since the temple was built and dedicated by Solomon hundreds of years earlier. It says in 2 Kings 23:21-22, “And the king commanded all the people, ‘Keep the Passover to the LORD your God, as it is written in this Book of the Covenant.’ For no such Passover had been kept since the days of the judges who judged Israel, or during all the days of the kings of Israel or of the kings of Judah.” Just before King David died, he commanded his son, Solomon to keep God’s commandments (1 Kings 2:2-3), but “when Solomon was old his wives turned away his heart after other gods, and his heart was not wholly true to the LORD his God, as was the heart of David his father” (1 Kings 11:4). As time went on, the kings of Israel and Judah were corrupted by the kings of the surrounding nations and idolatry replaced their worship of God as was predicted by Moses (Deuteronomy 31:27-29).

The central theme of Deuteronomy 29 and 30 was repentance and forgiveness. These chapters included the promise that God would restore the Israelites’ fortunes if they turned to the LORD with all of their hearts and obeyed his commandments. Moses said:

“And when all these things come upon you, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before you, and you call them to mind among all the nations where the Lord your God has driven you, and return to the Lord your God, you and your children, and obey his voice in all that I command you today, with all your heart and with all your soul, then the Lord your God will restore your fortunes and have mercy on you, and he will gather you again from all the peoples where the Lord your God has scattered you. If your outcasts are in the uttermost parts of heaven, from there the Lord your God will gather you, and from there he will take you. And the Lord your God will bring you into the land that your fathers possessed, that you may possess it. And he will make you more prosperous and numerous than your fathers. And the Lord your God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your offspring, so that you will love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, that you may live. And the Lord your God will put all these curses on your foes and enemies who persecuted you. And you shall again obey the voice of the Lord and keep all his commandments that I command you today. The Lord your God will make you abundantly prosperous in all the work of your hand, in the fruit of your womb and in the fruit of your cattle and in the fruit of your ground. For the Lord will again take delight in prospering you, as he took delight in your fathers, when you obey the voice of the Lord your God, to keep his commandments and his statutes that are written in this Book of the Law, when you turn to the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul.” (Deuteronomy 30:1-10)

The Hebrew word shuwb (shoob) appears in this passage seven times. Shuwb means “to turn back…’to return or go back, bring back.’ The basic meaning of the verb is movement back to the point of departure…The process called conversion or turning to God is in reality a re-turning or a turning back again to Him from whom sin has separated us, but whose we are by virtue of creation, preservation and redemption” (H7725). God used the word shuwb when he told Solomon, “If my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and seek my face and turn (shuwb) from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land” (2 Chronicles 7:14).

It says of Josiah in 2 Kings 23:25, “Before him there was no king like him, who turned (shuwb) to the LORD with all his heart and with all his soul and with all his might, according to the Law of Moses, nor did any like him arise after him.” This verse indicates that Josiah’s turning was an inward turning. Josiah turned toward God with all his heart, all his soul, and with all his might, “according to the Law of Moses.” What this might suggest is that Josiah became obsessed with obeying God’s commandments, but what was actually going on with Josiah had more to do with him falling in love with and being devoted to God than following the rules and regulations that were recorded by Moses on Mount Sinai. When Josiah inquired of the LORD about what he had read in the Book of the Law, Huldah the prophetess told him:

“Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel: ‘Tell the man who sent you to me, Thus says the Lord, Behold, I will bring disaster upon this place and upon its inhabitants, all the curses that are written in the book that was read before the king of Judah. Because they have forsaken me and have made offerings to other gods, that they might provoke me to anger with all the works of their hands, therefore my wrath will be poured out on this place and will not be quenched. But to the king of Judah, who sent you to inquire of the Lord, thus shall you say to him, Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel: Regarding the words that you have heard, because your heart was tender and you humbled yourself before God when you heard his words against this place and its inhabitants, and you have humbled yourself before me and have torn your clothes and wept before me, I also have heard you, declares the Lord. Behold, I will gather you to your fathers, and you shall be gathered to your grave in peace, and your eyes shall not see all the disaster that I will bring upon this place and its inhabitants.’” (2 Chronicles 34:23-28)

Josiah knew that he couldn’t change the outcome of his situation. Rather than trying to get God to relent, Josiah’s revival was intended to make the most of the time that was left before God’s people were taken into captivity. The hope that Josiah likely held onto was that he would be spared from the tragedy that was ahead and had been assured by God that he would experience life after death (2 Chronicles 34:28; Hebrews 12).

Upside down

God’s intention in delivering the Israelites from slavery in Egypt was for them to become a “kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:6). “God made a conditional promise to the Israelites that if they would obey him and keep his covenant, he would regard and treat them in a special way. The people chose instead to make a golden calf and forsake the God who rescued them from Egyptian slavery (Exodus 32:1-24). That event, as well as persistent infidelity throughout most of their history, greatly limited the extent to which the Israelites could realize these promises” (note on Exodus 19:5, 6). Near the end of King David’s dynasty, God intervened in Israel’s circumstances in order to correct the nation’s course so that his plan of salvation for the world would not be disrupted. It says in 2 Kings 21:10-13:

And the Lord said by his servants the prophets, “Because Manasseh king of Judah has committed these abominations and has done things more evil than all that the Amorites did, who were before him, and has made Judah also to sin with his idols, therefore thus says the Lord, the God of Israel: Behold, I am bringing upon Jerusalem and Judah such disaster that the ears of everyone who hears of it will tingle. And I will stretch over Jerusalem the measuring line of Samaria, and the plumb line of the house of Ahab, and I will wipe Jerusalem as one wipes a dish, wiping it and turning it upside down.

The phrase “wiping it and turning it upside down” was intended to express the process God would use to transform the situation that Manasseh had gotten himself and his kingdom into. The Hebrew words mâchâh (maw-khawˊ), hâphak (haw-vakˊ), and pânîym (paw-neemˊ) have to do with changing a person’s countenance or the look on one’s face (H4229/2015/6440). In English, we might tell a person who is smiling about breaking a rule or law to “wipe that look off your face,” meaning that the person’s expression is inappropriate for a person who has done something wrong. Manasseh showed no remorse for the atrocities he had committed (2 Kings 21:16) and so, God was going to do something about it.

It says in 2 Chronicles 33:10-13:

The Lord spoke to Manasseh and to his people, but they paid no attention. Therefore the Lord brought upon them the commanders of the army of the king of Assyria, who captured Manasseh with hooks and bound him with chains of bronze and brought him to Babylon. And when he was in distress, he entreated the favor of the Lord his God and humbled himself greatly before the God of his fathers. He prayed to him, and God was moved by his entreaty and heard his plea and brought him again to Jerusalem into his kingdom. Then Manasseh knew that the Lord was God.

Manasseh’s repentance was rewarded by him being returned to Jerusalem. It says that Manasseh humbled himself greatly before God and prayed to him (2 Chronicles 33:12-13). In other words, Manasseh was converted, he became a believer.

Manasseh’s distressful situation caused him to turn away from his sin and toward God. When God said that he was going to “wipe Jerusalem as one wipes a dish, wiping it and turning it upside down” (2 Kings 21:13), he was talking about emptying the city and its king of their pride. The Hebrew word pânîym, which is translated upside down, is derived from the word pânâh (paw-nawˊ). Pânâh means “to turn; by implication to face, i.e. appear, look etc…Most occurrences of this verb carry the sense ‘to turn in another direction’; this is a verb of either physical or mental motion…Used of intellectual and spiritual turning, this verb signifies attaching oneself to something…In an even stronger use this verb represents dependence on someone” (H6437). The Hebrew word hâphak, which is translated turning in 2 Kings 21:13, is used in 1 Samuel 10:6 to describe Saul’s conversion. “The meaning of ‘transformation’ or ‘change’ is vividly illustrated in the story of Saul’s encounter with the Spirit of God. Samuel promised that Saul ‘shalt be turned into another man’ (1 Samuel 10:6), and when the Spirit came on him, ‘God gave him another heart’ (1 Samuel 10:9).

The term upside down is also used in the New Testament in reference to the effect of the Apostle Paul preaching the gospel. Acts 17:1-7 tells us:

Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a synagogue of the Jews. And Paul went in, as was his custom, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and proving that it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead, and saying, “This Jesus, whom I proclaim to you, is the Christ.” And some of them were persuaded and joined Paul and Silas, as did a great many of the devout Greeks and not a few of the leading women. But the Jews were jealous, and taking some wicked men of the rabble, they formed a mob, set the city in an uproar, and attacked the house of Jason, seeking to bring them out to the crowd. And when they could not find them, they dragged Jason and some of the brothers before the city authorities, shouting, “These men who have turned the world upside down have come here also, and Jason has received them, and they are all acting against the decrees of Caesar, saying that there is another king, Jesus.”

The Jews who were jealous of Paul said that he and Silas had “turned the world upside down.” In this instance, upside down was intended to refer to being disturbed or unsettled, but the Greek word anastatoo (an-as-tat-oˊ-o) carries with it the connotation of a spiritual uprising or a spiritual awakening. Anastatoo is derived from the word anistemi (an-isˊ-tay-mee), which means “to stand up” (G450). Jesus used anastatoo to refer to his resurrection. Jesus told his disciples, “The Son of man is going to be delivered into the hands of men, and they will kill him. And when he is killed, after three days he will rise (anastatoo)” (Mark 9:31).

Manasseh’s conclusion “that the LORD was God” (2 Chronicles 33:13) was the result of him being returned to Jerusalem after having been captured with hooks and bound with chains and brought to Babylon (2 Chronicles 33:11). Manasseh’s world had literally been turned upside down. The fact that Manasseh was restored to his former position and served the LORD faithfully afterward (2 Chronicles 33:14-17) shows that God’s intended purpose was accomplished, even though the process was painful and Manasseh’s circumstances were severe. Following a brief reign by Amon, Manasseh’s son who abandoned the LORD (2 Kings 21:22); Josiah, Manasseh’s grandson, who was only eight years old when he began to reign, led Judah through a period of great revival. It is said of Josiah in 2 Kings 23:25, “Before him there was no king like him, who turned to the LORD with all his heart and with all his soul and with all his might, according to all the Law of Moses, nor did any like him arise after him.

The prostitute

One of the key themes that is found throughout the Bible is faithfulness. Faithfulness and believing are connected in that the Hebrew word âman (aw-manˊ) is translated both ways. It says of Abraham in Genesis 15:6 that he believed (âman) in the LORD (KJV) and of Moses in Numbers 14:11 that he was faithful (âman) to God. The opposite of course is unbelief or faithlessness (G570) which was identified numerous times by Jesus as the cause of Israel’s and more specifically, his disciples lack of spiritual success (Matthew 13:58; 17:20; Mark 6:6; 9:24; 16:14). Israel’s unfaithfulness was linked to their continual involvement with idolatry. Israel was forbidden from making covenants with the inhabitants of the Promised Land because of their tendency to worship other gods. The people of Israel were told before they entered the Promised Land:

“Observe what I command you this day. Behold, I will drive out before you the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites. Take care, lest you make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land to which you go, lest it become a snare in your midst. You shall tear down their altars and break their pillars and cut down their Asherim (for you shall worship no other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God), lest you make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, and when they whore after their gods and sacrifice to their gods and you are invited, you eat of his sacrifice, and you take of their daughters for your sons, and their daughters whore after their gods and make your sons whore after their gods.” (Exodus 34:11-16)

The LORD used the phrase whoring after their gods to describe idolatry. The Hebrew word that is translated whore, zânâh (zaw-nawˊ) means “to commit adultery… (figurative) to commit idolatry (the Jewish people being regarded as the spouse of Jehovah)” (H2181). Zânâh appears in most of the Major and Minor Prophets’ writings in conjunction with God’s judgment of Israel and the surrounding nations that influenced her to practice idolatry. Isaiah said of Jerusalem, “How the faithful city has become a whore, she who was full of justice! Righteousness lodged in her, but now murderers” (Isaiah 1:21).

One of the principal influences that led to Israel’s downfall was Assyria’s world dominance. At the height of the Assyrian Empire’s success, the king of Assyria, referred to as Sennacherib, defied the LORD and challenged King Hezekiah to give up his faith in God. The king of Assyria sent a message to King Hezekiah stating “Thus shall you speak to Hezekiah king of Judah: ‘Do not let your God in whom you trust deceive you by promising that Jerusalem will not be given into the hand of the king of Assyria. Behold, you have heard what the kings of Assyria have done to all lands, devoting them to destruction. And shall you be delivered? Have the gods of the nations delivered them, the nations that my fathers destroyed, Gozan, Haran, Razeph, and the people of Eden who were in Telassar? Where is the king of Hamath, the king of Arpad, the king of the city of Sepharvaim, the king of Hena, or the king of Ivvah?’” (2 Kings 19:10-13). Sennacherib compared Hezekiah’s God to the gods of other nations that had failed to protect their worshippers from Assyrian attacks. Hezekiah took the letter from Sennacherib and spread it out before the LORD and asked him to intervene because Sennacherib had mocked the living God (2 Kings 19:16).

Isaiah recorded God’s response to King Hezekiah’s prayer. Isaiah 37:21-32 states:

Then Isaiah the son of Amoz sent to Hezekiah, saying, “Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel: Because you have prayed to me concerning Sennacherib king of Assyria, this is the word that the Lord has spoken concerning him:

“‘She despises you, she scorns you—
    the virgin daughter of Zion;
she wags her head behind you—
    the daughter of Jerusalem.

“‘Whom have you mocked and reviled?
    Against whom have you raised your voice
and lifted your eyes to the heights?
    Against the Holy One of Israel!
By your servants you have mocked the Lord,
    and you have said, With my many chariots
I have gone up the heights of the mountains,
    to the far recesses of Lebanon,
to cut down its tallest cedars,
    its choicest cypresses,
to come to its remotest height,
    its most fruitful forest.
I dug wells
    and drank waters,
to dry up with the sole of my foot
    all the streams of Egypt.

“‘Have you not heard
    that I determined it long ago?
I planned from days of old
    what now I bring to pass,
that you should make fortified cities
    crash into heaps of ruins,
while their inhabitants, shorn of strength,
    are dismayed and confounded,
and have become like plants of the field
    and like tender grass,
like grass on the housetops,
    blighted before it is grown.

“‘I know your sitting down
    and your going out and coming in,
    and your raging against me.
Because you have raged against me
    and your complacency has come to my ears,
I will put my hook in your nose
    and my bit in your mouth,
and I will turn you back on the way
    by which you came.’”

“And this shall be the sign for you: this year you shall eat what grows of itself, and in the second year what springs from that. Then in the third year sow and reap, and plant vineyards, and eat their fruit. And the surviving remnant of the house of Judah shall again take root downward and bear fruit upward. For out of Jerusalem shall go a remnant, and out of Mount Zion a band of survivors. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will do this.

God pointed to the return of the exiles from Babylon as a sign of his future judgment of Assyria. The prophet Nahum’s entire message concerns the destruction of Nineveh, the capital of Assyria. “Nahum prophesied in the time between the Assyrian capture of No (Thebes) in Egypt (see Nahum 3:8-10), which is known to have occurred in 661 BC, and the final destruction of Nineveh in 612 BC (Nahum 2:8-13). Since verse fifteen of chapter 1 suggests that the feasts were being observed in Judah, it is probably that he ministered during or just after Josiah’s revival. This means he would have prophesied around 620 BC, or about the time of Habbakuk, Zephaniah, and the early part of Jeremiah’s ministry” (Introduction to Nahum).

It says in 2 Kings 19:35 that an angel struck down 185,000 in the camp of the Assyrians the night after Isaiah’s prophecy about Sennacherib’s fall. It states, “And when the people arose early in the morning, behold, these were all dead bodies.” Nahum referred to this incident in his condemnation of Nineveh. Nahum wrote:

Woe to the bloody city,
    all full of lies and plunder—
    no end to the prey!
The crack of the whip, and rumble of the wheel,
    galloping horse and bounding chariot!
Horsemen charging,
    flashing sword and glittering spear,
hosts of slain,
    heaps of corpses,
dead bodies without end—
    they stumble over the bodies!
And all for the countless whorings of the prostitute,
    graceful and of deadly charms,
who betrays nations with her whorings,
    and peoples with her charms.

Nahum used the Hebrew word zânâh when he referred to Nineveh as the prostitute whose countless whorings had brought about God’s destruction of the Assyrian army. The prostitute is mentioned in Revelation 17:1-6 in connection with the martyrdom of Christians during the great tribulation. It states:

Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and said to me, “Come, I will show you the judgment of the great prostitute who is seated on many waters, with whom the kings of the earth have committed sexual immorality, and with the wine of whose sexual immorality the dwellers on earth have become drunk.” And he carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness, and I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was full of blasphemous names, and it had seven heads and ten horns. The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and jewels and pearls, holding in her hand a golden cup full of abominations and the impurities of her sexual immorality. And on her forehead was written a name of mystery: “Babylon the great, mother of prostitutes and of earth’s abominations.” And I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints, the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.

When I saw her, I marveled greatly.

According to Bible teacher Dr. J. Vernon McGee, the great prostitute is the antichurch or false religion that is established for the purpose of worshiping antichrist. The references to sexual immorality have to do with idolatry, the worship of false gods (G4203). John indicated that a name was written on the forehead of the prostitute, “Babylon the great, mother of prostitutes and of earth’s abominations” (Revelation 17:5). John wanted his readers to understand that the antichurch would be the culmination of all false religions and would serve the purpose of leading a revolt against God that would threaten the existence of believers in Jesus Christ. Immediately following his discussion of the great prostitute and her relationship to antichrist, John went on to talk about the fall of Babylon (Revelation 18) and Christ’s return to earth (Revelation 19), suggesting that Antichrist’s brief world dominance will trigger the end times events that shift the balance of power back to worshippers of God.

Believe it or not

Abraham appears to be the first man that God communicated with after Adam sinned and was cast out of the garden of Eden. Their initial encounter is recorded in Genesis 12:1-3. It states, “Now the LORD said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.’” Later, Abraham questioned God’s faithfulness and was challenged to believe something that seemed impossible. Genesis 15:1-6 states:

After these things the word of the Lord came to Abram in a vision: “Fear not, Abram, I am your shield; your reward shall be very great.” But Abram said, “O Lord God, what will you give me, for I continue childless, and the heir of my house is Eliezer of Damascus?” And Abram said, “Behold, you have given me no offspring, and a member of my household will be my heir.” And behold, the word of the Lord came to him: “This man shall not be your heir; your very own son shall be your heir.” And he brought him outside and said, “Look toward heaven, and number the stars, if you are able to number them.” Then he said to him, “So shall your offspring be.” And he believed the Lord, and he counted it to him as righteousness.

The King James Version of the Bible indicates that Abraham “believed in the LORD.” The Hebrew word that is translated believed, âman (aw-man´) means “to stand firm, to trust, to be certain, to believe in” (H539). Âman is translated faithful in Numbers 12:7 where God said that Moses had been faithful to him and in Deuteronomy 7:9 where it says, “Know therefore that the LORD your God is God, the faithful God who keeps covenant and steadfast love with those who love him and keep his commandments, to a thousand generations, and repays to their face those who hate him, by destroying them.”

Faith and believing are linked together in the New Testament in the book of Hebrews. In the eleventh chapter of Hebrews, the author starts out by defining faith and then, goes on to give numerous examples of what faith looked like in the lives of people in the Old Testament who had believed in God. Hebrews 11:1 states, “Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen,” and then, the author stated, “By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received the promises was in the act of offering up his only son, of whom it was said, ‘Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.’ He considered that God was able even to raise him from the dead, from which, figuratively speaking, he did receive him back” (Hebrews 11:17-19).

Abraham’s faith was tested by his obedience to God’s command to offer his son as a sacrifice even though it seemed to contradict the promise that God had made about blessing all the families of the earth through his offspring Isaac (Genesis 12:3, 15:4). When Isaac asked his father where that lamb for the burnt offering was (Genesis 22:7), Abraham answered, “God will provide for himself the lamb for the burnt offering” (Genesis 22:8). Abraham understood that there was a need for a sacrifice for sin and believed that God would provide for that need himself. During his institution of the Lord’s Supper, after he had taken the cup and given thanks, Jesus told his disciples, “Drink of it all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Matthew 26:27-28).

On numerous occasions, Jesus warned his disciples that he was going to be killed, but assured them that he would be raised him from the dead (Matthew 20:19). After Jesus’ resurrection, an angel appeared to Mary Magdalene and Jesus’ mother Mary and told them, “Do not be alarmed. You seek Jesus of Nazareth, who was crucified. He has risen; he is not here. See the place where they laid him. But go, tell his disciples and Peter that he is going before you to Galilee. There you will see him, just as he told you” (Mark 16:6-7). Mark goes on to say:

Now when he rose early on the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, from whom he had cast out seven demons. She went and told those who had been with him, as they mourned and wept. But when they heard that he was alive and had been seen by her, they would not believe it. (Mark 16:9-11)

Mark indicated that Jesus’ disciples would not believe that he was alive. In other words, those who had been with Jesus when he instituted the Lord’s Supper, and were told numerous times that he would come back to life the third day after he was crucified (Matthew 20:19), refused to believe that he had actually done what he said he would.

Mark’s account of Jesus’ resurrection emphasized the point that some people believed and some did not when they were told about Jesus’ resurrection. Mark stated, “After these things he appeared in another form to two of them, as they were walking in the country. And they went back and told the rest, but they did not believe him” (Mark 16:12-13). It was not only Mary’s testimony that wasn’t believed, but also the testimony of two others to whom Jesus had appeared. The Greek word that is translated did not believe, apisteo (ap-is-teh´-o) means “to betray a trust, be unfaithful” and by implication to “disobey…i.e. without faith in God and Christ (Mark 16:16; Romans 3:3); to break one’s faith, to prove false (2 Timothy 2:13)” (G569). A person that is apisteo is an unbeliever (G571).

Paul considered the possibility that the disciples and other Jews’ unbelief could nullify the effect of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. Paul argued:

Then what advantage has the Jew? Or what is the value of circumcision? Much in every way. To begin with, the Jews were entrusted with the oracles of God. What if some were unfaithful? Does their faithlessness nullify the faithfulness of God? By no means! Let God be true though every one were a liar, as it is written,

“That you may be justified in your words,
    and prevail when you are judged.”

But if our unrighteousness serves to show the righteousness of God, what shall we say? That God is unrighteous to inflict wrath on us? (I speak in a human way.) By no means! For then how could God judge the world? But if through my lie God’s truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner? And why not do evil that good may come?—as some people slanderously charge us with saying. Their condemnation is just. (Romans 3:1-8)

Paul concluded that whether we believe it or not, Christ’s death on the cross paid the penalty for the sins of every person in the world and his resurrection demonstrated that God had provided the lamb himself as Abraham believed he would (Genesis 22:8). Paul used himself as an example to convey the point that a person’s unbelief justifies their condemnation because the truth is that everyone knows they are a sinner (Romans 3:9-20), but only those who are willing to admit the truth about themselves to God and others can and will be saved (Matthew 25:37-46; John 3:19-21; 1 John 1:9).